It is very rare for a church to organize any public event that even hints at a political theme. Indeed the very idea of organizing a public talk that centred around educating Christians on the political challenges that confront the Christian community would probably not go farther than being discussed among the leadership of the local church. So imagine my surprise when I received an e-mail from a friend a week ago informing me that the Sungai-Way Subang Methodist Church (SSMC) was organizing such a seminar. To be honest, I thought that SSMC would post an announcement on its website stating the seminar would be “postponed” until an appropriate time.
So imagine my (happy!) surprise when I discovered that the seminar would go on as planned last Sunday (18/7/2010). What was more surprising – yes, it was a day of pleasant surprises for me – was the large number of Christians, around three hundred of them, turning up to this event. Indeed a few years back, one would be happy if twenty Christians turn up to hear a public talk on Christians and politics. My hat off for SSMC for organizing such a seminar
I digress. The seminar was entitled “Christians and Citizenship” where it focused on the political challenges facing Malaysian churches in Peninsula and Sabah and Sarawak as well as on the relationship between Christians and the media. Both issues were interesting and informative. However my own interest in attending the seminar was on the former issue which had two knowledgeable insiders as speakers in the person of Rev. Sivin Kit (Bangsar Lutheran Church) and Rev. Jerry Dusing (President of SIB Sabah). Both raised pertinent points on this issue. One point in particular caught my attention and I want to add my own personal thoughts on it.
1. On the East-West “Divide”
Geographically speaking, the Peninsula is separated from Sabah and Sarawak by the South China Sea. This separation is not only physical but also historical as well as cultural. Indeed, such separation has consequences for the Church as well. Malaysian churches are divided geographically as well as economically and culturally.
Churches in the Peninsula tend to concentrate in urban areas where English is the primary language of local churches followed by Chinese and Tamil. On the other hand, the majority of the churches in Sabah and Sarawak are found in rural areas with Bahasa Malaysia being the language of choice in these churches.
Generally speaking, Christians in the Peninsula tend to be better educated and economically well-off compared to that of Sabah and Sarawak. According to the 9th Malaysian Plan, the non-Malay Bumiputeras of Sabah and Sarawak recorded the highest incidence of poverty.
I find it interesting that when Christians in the Peninsula talk about the religious demographics, they tend to say that Christians form 9% of the population. However, Christians in the Peninsula do not realise the fact that the largest number of Christians are to be found among the non-Malay Bumiputeras of Sabah and Sarawak. Christian Bumiputeras of Sabah and Sarawak form 64.4% of the Christian population while the balance is made up of Christians in the Peninsula (35.6%).
This simply tells us that the majority of Christians are to be found in Sabah and Sarawak where Bahasa Malaysia is the preferred language. In addition, they are not economically well-off as compared with their Peninsula counter-parts.
Perhaps the simplest way to demonstrate the disparate economic situation between those in the Peninsula with that of Sabah and Sarawak is by observing our church buildings. Church buildings in the Peninsula are better maintained with some undergoing renovation or even constructing new buildings. Some can even boast of facilities that can rival commercial buildings! The same cannot be said of the rural church buildings located in Sabah and Sarawak. At best, such buildings would be constructed of cement and wood with basic amenities. However, most are nothing more than run-down buildings that have seen better times.
2. Political implications of the “divide”
Although Sabahan and Sarawakian Christians form the majority, yet their voices and concerns tend to take second place to that of Peninsula Christians. Take for example the organisational set-up of many national bodies that represent the Christian communities, e.g. the Christian Federation of Malaysia (CFM), the Council of Churches Malaysia (CCM) and the National Evangelical Christian Fellowship (NECF) Malaysia. The headquarters of all these bodies are to be found in Kuala Lumpur rather than Kota Kinabalu or Kuching. In addition, most of the activities organised by these bodies tend to held in the Klang Valley with English being the language of choice.
To take another example … how many of us Peninsula Christians (and by that I include myself) take the time to understand the “Allah” controversy? Why are our brothers and sisters who use Bahasa adamant about not giving up this word in their liturgy? Are we aware of the implications of this controversy to our brothers and sisters – as well as to ourselves as members of the body of Christ – who use Bahasa Malaysia? Why are some of us trying to persuade our brothers and sisters to just substitute the word with “Tuhan” as an expedient solution to a potentially explosive political issue?
What is the point that I am trying to make here? Simply this: the relationship between “East and West” is tilted towards the minority Peninsula Christians which together with the economic and cultural divide will, in the long run, drive a wedge between Christians in the Peninsula and Sabah and Sarawak.
3. No, it is not my intention …
In writing this piece, I want to say that it is not my intention here to berate Christians in the Peninsula for what has happened but rather to bring to attention cultural and economical divide that separates Christians in Malaysia. As the Apostles’ Creed puts it, “I believe in the holy catholic church: the communion of saints” … amen.
The church as a whole must take steps to address this divide. For me, some of the practical steps would include:
- Helping our economically poorer brothers and sisters towards a better future. I would add the caveat that such help must never turn into a situation of dependency but independence and respect.
- Giving more voice to Christians in both states by having more Christian bumiputeras at the decision-making level so as to ensure their concerns are highlighted at the national level.
One of the major tragedies that befell global Christianity was the great schism of 1054 when the Church divide itself between Eastern and Western Christianity because of cultural, theological and political differences. The Church has yet to recover from this schism. Let us pray that such a tragedy does not befall on us.

The Micah Mandate is a Christian-based public interest advocacy ministry that seeks a transformation of our nation through justice, mercy and humility.





August 2nd, 2010 at 11:40 am
Chris
I was sorry I could not attend. Kudos to SSMC, I hope many more will follow their example.
Your piece is both enlightening and encouraging.
Your comments about the quality of construction of church-owned properties is particularly relevant post the Sibu by-election.
Perhaps one result of increased awareness of the demographic you mentioned will be that more “Malaysian Christian conferences” will be held in East Malaysia.
I wonder what topics/actions would be of interest to our EM brethren and what areas they would like to lead.
Rama
August 2nd, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I applaud your practical steps as below: My comments in Capital
The church as a whole must take steps to address this divide. For me, some of the practical steps would include:
Helping our economically poorer brothers and sisters towards a better future. I would add the caveat that such help must never turn into a situation of dependency but independence and respect.
INDEPENDENCE SHOULD NOT BE THE AIM BUT INTERDEPENDENCE. THE CHURCH IN MALAYSIA NEEDS BOTH SIDE OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA TO GROW.
Giving more voice to Christians in both states by having more Christian bumiputeras at the decision-making level so as to ensure their concerns are highlighted at the national level.
A GOOD START IS TO APPOINT PEOPLE THAT HAVE EARS AND HEARTS FOR THE INDIGENOUS CHURCHES AND HEAR THEM OUT. THERE ARE MANY AFTER 50 YEARS.